7 Free Web Quizzes to Grade Your Physical Health

Guest Posting by Mary Ward

It takes a lot of work to stay health conscious when life is so busy. Yet, for many people the need to evaluate their physical health can become a necessity. In some cases, a sudden illness may have prompted you to think more about your health. You might wonder what resources are out there to make it easier to evaluate you physical health. A great way to do this is to take an online quiz. Take a look at 7 free web quizzes to grade your physical health.

They are available on the following websites. Some offer multiple quiz options while other use a single quiz as a guide to help you get a handle on you current health status. Take some time to read through and take each one to see what they offer.

Quick Nutrition and Physical Activity Quiz – Established by the California Health Department, this website is a community outreach that offers a great quiz that not only tests your knowledge of proper foods and exercise, but also how these things impact your physical health. The network toolbox provides other sources as well, but its Quick Nutrition and Physical Activity Quiz is a main feature.

Better Health Channel – This Australian government website doesn't just offer one quiz it hosts nearly 50 distinct quizzes in six health and fitness categories. Whether you want to take a quick on digestive health or evaluate your personal exercise habits, you should be able to find a quiz that fits your situation.

Alive.com – Targeting the vegan, the holistic health, and other progressive communities, this page have a selection of quizzes that can be used to grade your physical health, among other things. Take a quiz to see if you're getting enough sleep. Rate your physical activity. Maybe you would like to evaluate how your physical health is affected by your workplace environment.

The American Heart Association – This interactive web quiz is used to evaluate how physical activity directly influences heart health. If you have questions about your own heart, you may want to take this quiz to find out how much you know—and what you can learn that could help you.

Free Health Test – If you haven't make physical health a priority, you should think about starting now. There is no reason to avoid this any longer. Start by taking this free health test offered by Sixwise.com. While it is a short quiz, it can help you re-prioritize physical health in your life.

Free Health Quizzes – Similar to what the Better Health channel offers, FunQuizCards.com offer a whole list of physical health quizzes that can help your rate your personal health levels. You can also investigate certain health issues by taking an informational quiz to help fill in the blanks.

OrganizedWisdom.com free health quizzes – Again, a great collection of diagnostic quizzes to help you shed some light on physical health. If you want to grade the quality of your current health, then one of these quizzes could be just what you need.

All of these free web quizzes exist to inform and challenge you to care more about your health and maybe take steps to make things better. Only you can improve your physical health. Often it takes a little information—or lack of it—to get you focused on what matters.


Mary E. Ward writes about how to apply to phlebotomy technician schools.

As a Country Have We Lost Compassion for Others?

It’s strange that elected officials in a nation founded on Christian principles are focused on insuring that our citizens with limited financial resources do not enjoy the same access to health care as they do. After all health care from their perspective is NOT a right, it is a privilege for those with resources. The Senate minority while striving to be an inclusive party is clearly opposed to any health insurance program that provides a public option. After all Medicare, Medicaid, Tri Care, military health care system and the Veteran’s Administration have demonstrated they are unable to provide quality care that is cost effective. The private insurance companies certainly have demonstrated they are very able to provide quality and cost effective care for those with the resources to pay for such. The conservative opposition means that for the vast majority of the uninsured and/or underinsured they are just out of luck. They had better get a job that provides health insurance, never get sick or maybe simply move to a more welcoming country. What a sad commentary on our nation and its values. We claim to be a Christian nation that welcomes all people and yet the very essence of Christ’s teaching are only used when it seems useful to further one’s personal agenda.

Is the United States becoming a country that is so individually focused that the need of our neighbor is simply not our concern? Are we becoming a country of self righteous individuals who only wants laws and policies passed that benefit themselves and to the “heck” with the “love thy neighbor” concept? Are we moving to country like ancient Rome when just before its fall the wealthy and politicians were only concerned about what was best for themselves. The needs of the people did not matter.

Would our economic problems been different if financial institutes were governed by a strict code of ethics? Should former Wall Street financial managers become regulators in the US Treasury Department with the sole intent of changing the regulators and rules that would allow their counterparts to profit through taking advantage of those with the most to lose?

Are we a country that is rapidly becoming one without morals? Why do we tolerate the killing of African Americans school children in one of our largest cities? What would be the Senate minority (largely white men) response if it was their children and grandchildren being killed? Why do we tolerate a 10 year child dying within sight of US capital from a tooth abscess?

Now why in the world would this group not figure out a way that health insurance can be provided for those who cannot afford such? Could it be that we are rapidly moving to a country which only cares about special interest groups, profits for themselves and their supporters, and those who look like themselves? The objection logically cannot be costs given this same group of legislators approved huge deficits during the George Bush regime. Our elected officials have an opportunity to start putting ethics and caring for each other back into government and and our society. Our churches of all dominations need to start acting upon the teaching in their Holy books be it the Bible, Koran, or Tara.

Maybe, just maybe if we can as a country muster enough courage to start demanding our elected official do what is right for our country; to live up to the constitution and declaration of independence, and our religious teaching maybe there will be hope for a new beginning. President Obama cannot do this alone. We must each awaken and take responsibility to again insure our country is a model that the citizens of the world want to look up to. Let’s start with insuring health care for our citizens.

Managing the Cost of Medications

Speaking up, being patient and using simple math can be the best medicine for your wallet.
Prescription medications are one of the most expensive and reoccurring costs you’ll face. Fortunately, many of them have generic counterparts that are available and less expensive. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration requires that generic drugs be as safe and effective as their brand-name counterpart. More than half of all prescriptions are for generic drugs. When your provider writes a prescription, ask for the generic substitute. If the provider gives you a sample drug, also ask for a generic prescription so you can use it for a refill if needed.
You also can call different pharmacies to find out their price for your prescribed medicine. In most cases, the prices will be similar. In others, you’ll be thanking yourself for making the effort.
If you have prescription coverage that includes a co-pay, it may be cheaper to pay the generic price of $10 of the medication versus the co-pay depending on your co-pay amount. For example, the co-pay on a prescription plan for a 90-day supply could run from $27 to $75. In this case, it is more cost effective to pay the $10.
Mail order also may be another option when the medicine is not needed immediately. Mail order usually is substantially cheaper and a 90-day supply is the usual order.
In some cases, over-the-counter drugs may be substituted for some prescribed medications. For instance, Claritin (Loratadine) can be purchased over the counter while its counterpart requires a prescription from a health care provider. The savings between the two can be substantial while the results are similar. Do yourself a favor and check with your health care provider or pharmacist.
Most of the time, the cost of medication does not depend on the dose. For example, a 100 mg Viagra tablet could cost the same as a 50 mg. Ask your provider or the pharmacist if the medication can be split. You may also find relative information on the Internet or through Consumer Reports about splitting drugs. If yes, you can save some money by getting a double dose of your prescription.
Using Pravastatin as an example, if your provider approves and your daily dose is 20 mg you can cut the 40 mg tablet in half and get a 180-day supply for $10. This is a substantial cost saving.
Those with numerous chronic illnesses may be in a situation where different providers prescribe a variety of medications. Ask your primary provider to review the medications and together you can determine which are needed. This could result in cost savings as well as the benefits to your health.
The pharmaceutical industry spends millions of dollars marketing directly to consumers. We are bombarded daily with television and print ads that promote numerous medications. The industry has found that their campaigns can direct patients to their specific product when other less costly options might be available.
Be careful about being persuaded that a heavily marketed medication is appropriate for you. A substitute drug for a 10th of the cost may be just as beneficial.
So be aware and speak up when it comes to your health. You’ll save money and not sacrifice quality medications.

Stimulus Plan A Potential Boost for UTEP's SON

With the signing of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, into law this week should provide a significant opportunity for UTEP and its health related disciplines and researchers to secure additional funding. Nearly $140 billion in funding for health care is targeted to support a number of healthcare activities that could significantly impact UTEP ‘s research agenda. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) will receive $10 billion with more than $8 billion targeted to fund research. The funding for NIH has been relatively flat for the past six years resulting in limited growth in the creation of new knowledge. The $10 billion will be on top of the existing $29 billion annual funding.

Currently NIH funds on an average 10% of the research proposals submitted. These new funds which must be spent over the next two years means that other competitive research applications that did not make the cut will now have an opportunity to be considered. This may mean that for UTEP researchers engaged in research such HIV/AIDs, environmental health, Hispanic health disparities, diabetes, obesity, Alzheimer’s disease, heart disease as well as other areas of investigations may be able to secure additional moneys.

While investigating important health issues the infusion of funds will also mean the creation of new jobs and opportunities for local vendors to provide supplies and equipment needed to conduct the research. It is estimated that nationally some 70,000 jobs can be created as a result of this investment in research. In the School of Nursing alone over 20 positions are funded in whole or part by either NIH or Health Service Resources Administration (HRSA) funds.

Another $1.1 million is targeted to fund comparative research that will support investigations that compare different treatment approaches against each other. For example, projects that compare newer drugs prescribed to manage elevated cholesterol with less expensive generic formulas are the type of comparisons that are anticipated to be funded. There is evidence suggesting that some existing treatments and medications may not be as effective as those that cost less. Pharmaceutical, medical supplies and equipment manufactures in a free market system have incentives to push their latest product even thought the effectiveness of such may be the same or less than a cheaper option. The Obama stimulus package will encourage investigations to evaluate alternatives so that any costs savings can be pass on the consumer without impacting outcomes of care. Potentially billions in cost saving can be achieved from the results of such comparisons.

With support provided in part by the Hispanic Health Disparities Research Center a NIH Center of Excellence and the Office of Research and Sponsored Projects, UTEP investigators from across the campus have been actively engaged in drafting new and refining prior submissions in anticipation of the opportunity to tap these new funds. UTEP’s School of Nursing ranks 28th in the nation (out over 700 bachelor and higher degree granting Schools of Nursing in nation) for the amount of its NIH funding.

The stimulus package also provides $500 million for health professional education. Nursing Workforce Development Programs (Title VIII of the Public Health Service Act) and the Health Professions Training Programs (Title VII) were allocated $300. This means your School of Nursing will hopefully receive additional funds to educate more nurses for our community.

Ensuring Quality Nursing Care

Ever wonder how nurses and physicians learn to manage medical emergencies? In many health care professional educational curricula the age old apprentice model of “See One, Do One, Teach One” is a common methodology. This in essence means that nurses and physicians rely primarily upon learning how to care for patients in clinical settings after they have had a period of “book learning” that theoretically prepared them to provide competent care. Given the infrequent occurrence of emergencies (with the exceptions of those seen in emergency rooms) only a few students may actual be on the unit to participate in an emergency. Thus learning how to manage life threatening emergencies is taught primarily in the classroom. This model of education does not assure providers’ competency.

Can you image an airline pilot learning how to handle emergencies solely through classroom instruction? Given the significant risk to the public, airlines are required to include simulation training in the education of pilots. Commercial pilots must demonstrate competency in managing flight emergencies via simulators at least every six months. Further safety protocols include check rides with expert flight instructors to assure that the pilots are competent.

One would think that perhaps in health care when a person’s well being is often dependent upon the expertise of a provider’s competency there would be a similar quality process in place. Unfortunately, preventable medical errors are so frequent in a 1999 report “To Err is Human” issued by the Institute of Medicine, it was estimated that up to 98,000 people in the U.S. die annually from medical errors. This is equivalent to 245 Boeing 747’s crashing each year in which 400 passengers die. Imagine the public outcry if the flying public was subject to such a high death rate.

Have you heard a protest about the unnecessary deaths and injury that occur daily in our nation’s hospitals? Given the deaths and injuries occurring in hospitals all over the country, the reporting in aggregate numbers does not occur. The extent of the problems with quality of care and the prevalence of medical errors have not drawn the national attention that they deserve. Thus our system of “sick care” has not had the same degree of public accountability.

The National Quality Forum and the Joint Commission on Healthcare Organizations (accrediting agency for hospitals) as well as other national professional groups have launched major efforts to improve the quality of care provided in our nation’s hospitals. “To Err is Human” and a follow up report also by the Institute of Medicine “Crossing the Quality Chasm” are the driving forces for the Institute of Healthcare Improvement’s 100,000 Lives Campaign. This 2006 initiative claims to have saved an estimated 124,000 lives in an 18-month period through care improvement activities conducted in over 3,000 of the counties 7,569 hospitals.

Where does the fault lie? As Harry Truman would say, “The buck stops here!” And in this case it appears to be our nation’s hospitals and their quality monitoring processes used to ensure safe care to patients. The shortage of registered nurses, inefficiency of existing care delivery models, lack of electronic medical records that can be programmed to alert staff to potential errors, health care providers who have not keep current in their practice, and economic pressures have contributed to these quality challenges. Health care provider education is certainly a critical factor in this mix. Registered nurses, physicians and others on the health care team must be educated to be critical thinkers, problem solvers, committed to lifelong learning, and taught how to assess and improve the care they provide.

Fortunately, the apprentice model of educating nurses at the University of Texas at El Paso is a thing of the past. The School of Nursing is 100 percent committed to improving the quality of care provided to our citizens through changing the paradigm of educating tomorrow’s nurses.

A major feature of this new shift is the use of scenario based education. In this model students learn how to care for complex patient conditions without ever stepping foot in a hospital. Through the use of “life like” computerized mannequins students are taught how to assess the most common conditions of patients found in hospitals, to implement an evidenced based plan of care, and to evaluate the outcome of the interventions. The mannequins are programmed by the faculty to simulate a variety of conditions and to introduce complications to teach the students how to manage safely even the most complex patients. The simulated patient’s condition changes depending on the interventions implemented.

By doing this the student is able to learn how to safely provide nursing care in the safety of the Simulation Center. The student can practice repeatedly procedures, assessments, interventions, etc until achieving competency in safely managing the condition or conditions presented. The UTEP students before graduating must demonstrate competency in managing emergencies and the most common diagnoses. This is one method used to insure students are safe and competent nurses thus hopefully contributing to the reduction of medical errors and resulting unnecessary deaths.

Just like the airline industry UTEP’s School of Nursing is rapidly incorporating into its program the use of technology. Such a move provides a rich learning environment for students while not placing any patients at risk. In the near future we will also be using standardized patients who are actors that use a faculty developed script designed to teach the student to interact with a “real live” person. The student is provided lab data and other assessment information. Thus the technique provides another means to teach students how to competently managed selected patient conditions.

Thus, in creating the new health professionals building for the School of Nursing and College of Health Sciences, designers have created spaces and infrastructure that can be adapted to changes in curriculum as they emerge. Our existing simulation centers, currently located on the UTEP campus as well as at Sierra Medical Center and Del Sol Medical Center, are our central hubs of learning activities. The centers are becoming a focus of credentialing not only for UTEP students, but also for health professionals in our Far West Texas region and potentially in Central and South America.

In the immediate future, our primary focus will be educating more BSN and graduate prepared nurses. By 2017, the Upper Rio Grande Workforce estimates El Paso County will need nearly 2,400 new nurses, of which at least 80 percent should be prepared at the undergraduate level. We will continue to expand our traditional and Fast Track BSN options, and offer an LVN to BSN program beginning in summer of 2009, that incorporates online and other instructional technology. The five-year goal is to increase by 125 percent of our existing number of BSN graduates from our 2006-07 baseline of 159 students.

Your School of Nursing is committed to educating the nurses needed for our community to ensure the highest quality of care available is being given. Increasing the number of registered nurses, with a BSN degree, at the bedside ensures a higher quality of care. You can rest assured that the UTEP School of Nursing is committed to its vision of becoming the premier Hispanic-serving School of Nursing in the nation thus contributing excellence in its graduates.

What Would Obama’s Health Plan Do for El Paso?

In El Paso County nearly 40% of its’ population are without access to health insurance. In some colonias the rate of uninsured approaches 60%. Despite this high percentage of underinsured for profit healthcare systems have flag ship hospitals located in El Paso and our taxpayer supported Thomason Hospital reports they are in the best financial position than they have been in recent years. Clearly even with our high rate of underserved healthcare is big business in our community.

It is estimated in 2005 between the for-profit hospitals and the public sector facilities nearly $900 million in net patient revenues was generated. While the percentage of uncompensated care averaged 4.72% for the Tenet and HCA hospitals, Thomason provided 37.6% uncompensated care and still reported net operating income totaling for the past two years of nearly $70 million.

The Obama plan calls for coverage for all Americans. If an individual has insurance under his proposed plan individual premiums will decrease. Every individual will be able to buy into a health insurance plan similar to those provided to Federal employees including our enjoyed by our Congressional delegation.

No one will be turned away because of pre-existing conditions, employment status or ability to pay. No longer will an individuals’ health status or history be the basis for denial of health coverage.

Obama’s health plan will require a full range of services including mental health and disease management requirements. A significant component will be supporting health promotion and disease preventions strategies with proven effectiveness. Our public health system long neglected will see a revitalization to insure programs and surveillance systems are in place to protect our nation’s health. Hopefully this means we will no longer need to be concerned about clean water that is free of pollutants, or foods contaminated with salmonella.

A major initiative will be on supporting the continuing development of our infrastructure for disaster response. Katrina revealed the serious challenges that our existing disaster response system faces. While substantial progress has been made through a variety of Homeland Defense programs aimed to improving local, state, and national responses to both terrorist and natural disasters challenges remain. The Obama economic stimulus plan (being considered at press time) provides up to $100 million to prepare for a national health disaster.

Like plans in Japan small business will be able to purchase insurance from low risk pools and not have to pay high premiums because of the inability to purchase coverage at reasonable rates.

The Obama plan will provide tax credits that will cover up to 50% of the costs. The secondary insurance pool will provide coverage for those with catastrophic health problems.
The free market insurance system will continue with individuals having the option of purchasing private insurance plans that will provide more options for those desiring such. This is similar to private plans in Australia and Canada. Individuals with these plans (depending on the benefit and payment options) can select plans that allow more flexibility.

Obama also promises to take on the big insurance, pharmaceutical and medical supplies/equipment companies in addition to other special interest groups who spend millions of dollars lobbying against reform of the healthcare system to maintain generous profits. No longer will the US subsidize the costs of developing new drugs, emerging technologies, and other innovations while the same products/drugs are sold in other countries sometimes for a less than 25% of the cost charged in the US.

High standards for quality will be required and will be achieved in part through implementation of electronic medical records and more efficiencies in the delivery of health services and in the administration of the health plans. Obama is already moving forward with his plans to encourage the adaption of IT innovations in health care. In the administration’s economic stimulus package (being considered at press time) allocates more than $20 billion for the implementation of IT enhancement such as electronic medical records.

Physicians who agree to participate in the IT enhancement would be eligible for higher reimbursement rates from Medicare and Medicaid as well as payments between $45,000 and $65,000 once they can prove they are using IT effectively. In addition, hospitals would also be eligible to receive millions of dollars for IT adaptations.

Image the impact on our local economy if the 40% of our citizens without insurance are suddenly eligible for health care. Assuming Obama’s health reform plan is passed or something similar by the end of 2012, El Paso will benefit from this tremendous growth that will occur when our large population of uninsured individuals are suddenly eligible for health care.

As a community we are already challenged with a having adequate numbers of hospital beds, nurses, physicians, and other health care providers. The impact of the growth at Fort Bliss has facilitated significant increase in the number of military personnel, their dependents, and retirees. With this growth alone we will need by 2012 another 2,300 nurses, a significant increase in the number of physicians, and other healthcare provider.

The existing infrastructure is not ready for the current growth let alone the increase demand that could come from increasing health care coverage for all citizens. Schools of Nursing and Medicine will need to significantly increase their capacity. The number of residency positions for new medical school graduates will need to be increased to assure the new physicians will stay in El Paso. Other health professionals including ancillary health related occupations will also need to gear up to help meet the workforce needs.

The existing practice acts particularly for advance practice nurses, optometrists, podiatrists, physical therapists, pharmacists, psychologists to name a few must be updated and scope of practice enlarged. The restrictions while in the past perhaps were warranted are no longer justified given the current educational preparation of these non physician health care providers, The demands for high quality health services are going to be unrelenting and the practice acts for non physician providers will need to amended to insure the public will receive quality care.

The economic impact of forthcoming health care reform will have a significant impact on El Paso in the near future. We must plan now to insure we are ready for this new growth. High school students need to be encouraged to seek health career so they can be academically prepared for health care professional education. Fast track educational preparation for health care professions needs to be incorporated into early college programs that are available to high school students.

We will have an unprecedented demand for hospitals beds, home health care, primary care, and specialty care. Unfortunately as with most countries with universal coverage longer waiting times for elective procedures as well as delays in obtaining appointment from specialists will probably be the norm. Those who purchase the private insurance options will most likely have quicker access to care due to their ability to pay the higher fees associated with private care.

The bottom line is that El Paso will experience substantial growth in its healthcare industry. Significant economic opportunities will emerge given our pent up demands for health care. The growth will come with challenges and perhaps a change in how those who now have health insurance will be able to obtain such in a timely manner.

As a community we need to be aggressive in our planning to insure our citizens will have the health resources needed. This means an active engagement in strategic planning to assure we ready to meet this challenge. Are we committed?